If you've ever delved into the world of screenplay structure analysis, you'll probably agree that there are many ways to cut a movie apart.
There's the "classic" 3-Act structure and with that the 1, 2 , 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 Act structures. (Why not 6?) You'll also find a Sequence Approach from
Paul Gulino. A Hero's Journey structure from Joseph Campbell exists. Along with another version of the Hero's Journey by Christopher Vogler. In addition to Jacob Krueger who writes about the
Hegelian Dialectic. Let's not forget Blake Snyder's Save The Cat. And speaking of structure, you've got to talk about archetypes which you can structure your story around too. Which leads me to one of the most complex systems of structural analytics known as Dramatica. And so on and so forth.
What's intriguing is that when you take each of these approaches and analyze your favorite films they all work.
They all work. Like the image above in which there is a face, a butterfly, an angel, an alien, a teddy bear, etc., all structural models are similar but different. What you see is what you get and what you get is whatever you want to see.
What's doubly intriguing is that none of them can make you understand why a film connects with you or any other human being. C'est la vie, right?
I would argue that a writer can take all of these models and place them in a drawer within a cabinet within a dumpster and safely land on their feet with a great story.
How?
If you focus on one scene at a time. And focus on your characters as if they were real people who should react in a realistic way, you'll be writing well. You'v got to be sincere. You've got to stop and think after each action, "What would actually happen at this point, within the "rules" of the story I've been writing?" It's realistic to spend a day or two on one scene. You've got to read it and be honest. Be sincere, even if it's comedy.